5 | Legalities: The Journal of Law and Society in AUS and NZ
Legalities: The Journal of Law and Society in Australia and New ZealandVolume 3 Issue 1
合法性：澳新法律与社会杂志 第3卷第1期
本期目录
1.
Worms: Primordial juris-prudence and viral being
蠕虫：法理学对病毒侵害的原初回应
2.
Decolonising global solidarity: The WHO’s broken alarm and Epidemiological Nationalism
后殖民时代的全球团结：大流行时代的全球民族主义如何回应世卫组织失灵的预警体系
3.
The struggle to breathe: Pandemic years on western frontiers
绝望与挣扎：大流行时代下的西部边界
4.
“Is there an eternal return of HIV / AIDS-related discrimination?”: Law reform in the karmic machines of time and becoming
对艾滋病的歧视会永存吗?——基于因果报应代际传递的法律改革之进程
5.
Review of Katherine Biber, Priya Vaughan and Trish Luker, Law s Documents: Authority, Materiality, Aesthetics
书评：《法律文本：权威、实质与美学》（Katherine Biber、Priya Vaughan、Trish Luker）
部分文章摘要
01
Decolonising global solidarity: The WHO’s broken alarm and epidemiological nationalism
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has traumatised world leaders, leading people to question the capability and accountability of global health governance. Against this background, we have heard multiple calls to strengthen ‘solidarity’ within and between states – which, weirdly, is practised by keeping a distance from ‘Others’ through, for instance, social distancing, lockdowns, and border control. In this paper, I first introduce the post-World War II international pandemic response regime, especially the International Health Regulations 2005, using the multiple positions of the Republic of China and/or Taiwan to illustrate the prioritisation of national sovereignty over health justice. In and beyond this context, I conceptualise epidemiological nationalism, which contains three dimensions (territorial, affective, and epistemic) to critically examine the responses to COVID-19 from the WHO and different states. This concept enables us to analyse the solidarity-through-distancing practices from a decolonial perspective to deconstruct the contemporary global health regime. The regime is underpinned by the coloniality of modern epidemiology, which creates the hierarchies between nations and races imposed on the making and working of geographical, population, and disease categories by racialising diseases and response measures. Such racialisation practices vary in different contexts and are often tied to states’ securitisation practices, which justify the exclusion of minority communities.
摘要：新冠大流行给世界各国造成创伤，导致人们质疑全球卫生治理能力和各国问责制度。在此背景下，多次出现关于加强国家内部和国家之间“团结”的呼吁。然而，这种“团结”是通过社交距离、封锁和边境控制等方式与“他者”保持距离来实现的。本文首先介绍了二战后的国际流行病应对制度，特别是《国际卫生条例（2005）》，并使用中国台湾地区等多个地区对该问题的立场来说明国家主权优先于卫生正义。在此背景下，应将流行病学的民族主义概念化，其中包含领土、情感和认知三个维度，以批判性地审视世界卫生组织和不同国家对大流行病的反应。这一概念使我们能够从非殖民化的角度分析通过距离来实习团结的做法，以解构当代全球卫生制度。现代流行病学的殖民性为该制度提供了基础，通过将疾病和应对措施种族化，在地理、人口和疾病类别的制定和运作中强加了国家和种族之间的等级制度。这种种族化做法在不同的背景下各不相同，通常与国家的安全措施有关，这为排斥少数族裔群体提供了理由。
02
The struggle to breathe: Pandemic years on western frontiers
Abstract：Multiple existential threats – climate breakdown, disease, police violence, lawlessness, trauma, and systemic harms – characterise the pandemic years on western frontiers. This essay considers these and argues that disaster capitalism and authoritarian politics overpower scientific consensus and public opinion in ways that literally and figuratively cause a struggle to breathe.
摘要：多重生存威胁是西部边界在大流行年的特征，包括气候破坏、疾病、警察暴力、法治缺失、创伤和系统性危害。本文探讨了这些问题，并认为灾难资本主义和威权政治压倒了科学共识和公众舆论，在字面和隐喻两种意义上都导致了“绝望与挣扎”。
整理 | 任帅丞
排版、审核 | 寇韵楳、薛榆淞
http://file.tax100.com/o/202311/03/353_1698990919765.jpg?width=1080&size=117321
北京大学税法研究中心
Peking University
Center for Tax Law
http://file.tax100.com/o/202311/03/798_1698990919952.jpg?width=430&size=25570
长按二维码关注我们
页:
[1]